Hybrid warfare in the context of information confrontation

Research Article
How to Cite
Aliyev D.F. Hybrid warfare in the context of information confrontation. Science. Culture. Society. 2024. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 8-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2024.30.4.1 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article reveals the place and role of information influence on the enemy's audiences in conflicts of hybrid format. A brief review of the main scientific approaches to the study of hybrid wars in modern academic literature is given. Methodological and legal difficulties in the search for an adequate definition of the concept of ‘hybrid warfare’ are noted. It is emphasised that the ways of hybrid influence on the masses are the result of globalisation and the formation of information society. The peculiarities of unconventional techniques in military-political conflicts are considered by the author in the context of the policy of ‘post-truth’. The objective prerequisites for the spread of various ways of manipulating information in order to achieve political superiority over the enemy are analysed. The existing methods of cognitive influence on the consciousness of citizens are considered as weapons that are used by participants of military-political confrontation anonymously, without a declaration of war. The authors conclude that the success of hybrid attacks depends not so much on technology as on the ability of the authorities to maintain socio-political stability in the state.
Keywords:
hybrid war, information influence, information-psychological operation, unconventional conflict, post-truth, post-factual politics, political destabilisation, mass consciousness, target audiences, media image

Author Biography

Dzhomart F. Aliyev, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Economics, First Vice-Rector

References

1. Agashkova P. I., Gribovod E. G., Gular D. D. [et al.]. Soft power: theory, resources, discourse. Ekaterinburg: Discourse-Pi; 2015. (In Russ.).

2. Hoffman F. Conflict in the 21st century: the rise of hybrid warfare. Arlington, Virginia: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies; 2007. Available at: http://www.projectwhitehorse.com/pdfs/HybridWar_0108.pdf (accessed 10.06.2018).

3. Nye J. S. The future of power: how the strategy of smart power changes the 21st century. Moscow: AST; 2013. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-17-081896-9.

4. Linebarger P. Psychological warfare. Moscow: Voenizdat; 1962. (In Russ.).

5. Macdonald S. Propaganda and information warfare in the twenty-first century. London: Routledge; 2007. ISBN 978-0415545006.

6. Manoylo A. V. Hybrid wars and color revolutions in global politics. Law and Politics. 2015;(7):918–929. (In Russ.). DOI 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.7.15832.

7. Matveeva A. M. Hybrid wars and the color revolutions in geopolitics of postmodernism. Locus: People, Society, Culture, Meanings. 2019;(4):96–111. (In Russ.).

8. Pershin Y. Y. Hybrid warfare: lots of noise out of nothing. Security Issues. 2019;(4):78–109. (In Russ.). DOI 10.25136/2409-7543.2019.4.30374.

9. Sosnovskaya A. M. Ideology and mass communication: the hybrid war in Ukraine. Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo instituta RANKhiGS. 2016;7(3):134–142. (In Russ.).

10. Lanovoi V. G. Sovereignty and the mechanism of legal regulation as the main characteristics of public administration. In: Law and State: problems of methodology, theory and history: Mater. X All-Russian scientific-practical conf. Krasnodar: KrU MVD Rossii; 2021. P. 136–140.

11. Ivashov L. G. Operation "soft power" in a hybrid war. Geopolitika i bezopasnost'. 2017;(3):14–24. (In Russ.).

12. Aliev D. F., Tafintsev D. V., Khazin A. L. [et al]. Hybrid war: in 2 vol. Vol 1. Мoscow: RGSU; 2023. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7139-1443-1.

13. Panarin I. N. The basics of the hybrid war theory. The security problems institute of CIS. 2019;(4):58–71. (In Russ.).

14. Kuvyrchenkova T. V. To the concept of armed conflict: problems of definitioning. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2014;(4):240–246. (In Russ.).

15. Ivaschenko M. A. On the concept and attributes of a hybrid war. Russian Investigator. 2021;(12):39–41. (In Russ.). DOI 10.18572/1812-3783-2021-12-39-41.

16. Konyshev V., Parfenov R. Hybrid wars – between myth and reality. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2019;63(12):56–66. (In Russ.). DOI 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-56-66.

17. Gerasimov V. The Russian Federation defense organization in the conditions of the enemy application the traditional and “hybrid” methods of the war fighting. Vestnik Akademii voennykh nauk. 2016;(2):19–23. (In Russ.).

18. Konyshev V. N., Sergunin A. A. Discussions on future wars in the Russian expert-analyst community: myths and reality. National Strategy Issues. 2013;(4):100–114. (In Russ.).

19. Domnin I. From the First World War to the ‘Third World War’: Life Path of the General Staff Colonel E. E. Mesner. In: You Want Peace, Win the Rebellion. Moscow: Russkij Put’; 2005. P. 19–72. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-85887-134-8.

20. Boorstin D. The Americans: the colonial experience. Moscow: Progress; 1993. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-01-002601-5.

21. Barabash V., Kotelenets E., Lavrentieva M. Information warfare: studying the genesis of the terminology. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija. 2019;(3):76–89. (In Russ.).

22. Viren G. Modern media: information warfare techniques. Moscow: Aspect Press; 2013. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7567-0701-4.

23. Kikhtan V. V., Kachmazova Z. N. Information war: concept, contents and main forms of manifestation. Vestnik of Volzhsky University after V.N. Tatischev. 2018;2(2):228–235. (In Russ.).

24. Meyssan T. Crimes of the Deep State: from September 11 to Donald Trump. Moscow: AST; 2017. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-17-104734-4.

25. Alexander J. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Sociological journal. 2012;(3):5–40. (In Russ.).

26. Beilin M. V. Consciental wars in the era of information technologies. Science. Art. Culture. 2018;(3):169–177. (In Russ.).

27. Achkasov V. A., Baranov N. A., Budko D. A. [et al.]. Post-truth politics’ and populism. St. Petersburg: Scythia-print; 2018. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-98620-336-2.

28. Copeland N. Psychology and the soldier. Moscow: Voenizdat; 1991. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-203-01275-X.

29. Levashov V. K., Velikaya N. M., Shushpanova I. S. [et al.]. How are you, Russia? Express information. 54th stage of the sociological monitoring, April 2024. Moscow: FCTAS RAS, 2024. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-429-1.2024.

30. Bryant J., Thompson S. Fundamentals of Media Effects. Moscow: Villiams; 2004. (In Russ.). ISBN 5-8459-0597-4.

31. Vasilkova V., Legostaeva N. Social bots in political communication. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2019;19(1):121–133. (In Russ.). DOI 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-121-133.

32. Kasyuk A. Y. Information warfare: history and contemporaniety. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social sciences. 2018;(1):26–39. (In Russ.).

33. Nizovtseva N. F., Grishanin N. V. Hybrid war as a geopolitical trend. Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo instituta RANKhiGS. 2016;7(3):76–85. (In Russ.).
Article

Received: 06.04.2024

Accepted: 20.12.2024

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Aliyev, D. F. (2024). Hybrid warfare in the context of information confrontation. Science. Culture. Society, 30(4), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2024.30.4.1
Section
Modern political processes in Russia and abroad