Dynamics of socio-economic attitudes of Russians under the conditions of the SWO: sociological measurement

Research Article
How to Cite
Shushpanova I.S. Dynamics of socio-economic attitudes of Russians under the conditions of the SWO: sociological measurement. Science. Culture. Society. 2025. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 36-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2025.31.1.3 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article presents a sociological analysis of the key indicators characterising the dynamics of socio-economic attitudes of Russians during the special military operation. The empirical base of the study is the data of sociological monitoring ‘How are you, Russia?’, conducted by the Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS, for 2022 and 2024. The author's model of sociological research includes the study of the structure of public anxieties, the nature of relations between the state and society in the context of the implementation of socio-economic transformations, the features of deprivation and citizens' assessments of their own financial situation. It was found that during the period under study there was a partial redistribution of priority fears for Russians. The importance of security problems at various levels has increased, while at the same time a decrease in the importance of economic threats has been noted against the background of an increase in citizens' assessment of the effectiveness of state policy in the sphere of economic transformation. Despite the decrease in significance, economic worries remain in the lead, forcing citizens to resort to self-restraint. The factor analysis allowed us to identify the key components describing the nature of citizens' deprivations. The first factor was restrictions related to vital needs. Russians tried not to save money to satisfy these needs. The second factor includes social needs of citizens, the temporary restriction of which did not cause significant changes in their life activities. Statistical analysis showed stabilisation of the material situation of the population with a decrease in the poverty rate. As a positive trend, the growth of money wealth of the middle class was recorded as a result of increased labour motivation. The results obtained can be used to adjust the state social policy and develop measures to maintain social stability in crisis conditions.
Keywords:
society, state, government, deprivation, financial situation, anxiety, socio-economic situation, reforms, special military operation, socio-economic attitudes

Author Biography

Irina S. Shushpanova, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Sociology, Associate professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Sociology

References

1. Fadeeva E. V. Social and economic status of mid-level medical personnel during the coronavirus pandemic. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2022;(1):75–85. (In Russ.). DOI 10.28995/2073-6401-2022-1-75-85.

2. Doroshina A. V. Socio-economic well-being of the youth of Europe and Russia as the basis for building life strategies. Science. Culture. Society. 2022;28(2):98–111. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/nko.2022.28.2.8.

3. Tikhonova N. E. The impact of crisis on the life of Russian middle class. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2016;(4):48–64. (In Russ.).

4. Karavay A. V. The behavior of Russians aimed at improving their financial situation in the era of COVID-19. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021;(2):121–137. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1837.

5. Pyatsheva E. N. Socio-economic features of the development of single-industry towns in Russia. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2021;(3):73–83. (In Russ.). DOI 10.28995/2073-6401-2021-3-73-83.

6. Mukomel V. I. Crimea in expectation of changes: socio-economic context. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2019;(2):141–156. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.07.

7. Kaminskii V. S. Social mood of inhabitants of Vologda region in economic crisis conditions. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naia praktika. 2016;4(2):21–39. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/snsp.2016.4.2.4269.

8. Levashov V. K., Velikaya N. M., Shushpanova I. S. [et al.]. How are you, Russia? Express information. 52nd stage of the sociological monitoring, May 2022. Moscow: FCTAS RAS; 2022. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-400-0.2022.

9. Levashov V. K., Velikaya N. M., Shushpanova I. S. [et al.]. How are you, Russia? Express information. 54th stage of the sociological monitoring, April 2024. Moscow: FCTAS RAS; 2024. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-429-1.2024.

10. Shushpanova I. S. The socio-economic situation of the Russians in the context of saving people: sociological analysis. Management Issues. 2023;17(2):7–19. (In Russ.). DOI 10.22394/2304-3369-2023-2-7-19.

11. Belopashentseva P. V. Official and subjective poverty in Russia: the impact of 2020–2021 events. Sociological Studies. 2023;(10):78–90. (In Russ.). DOI 10.31857/S013216250028306-9.

12. Belopashentseva P. V. What does the deprivation approach say about Russian poverty? Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2022;(4):110–129. (In Russ.). DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2022.4.2224.

13. Gorshkov M. K. (ed.). Russia, which is being reformed: Yearbook: issue 19. Moscow: Novy Chronograf; 2021. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/ezheg.2021.

14. Epikhina Yu. B., Chernysh M. F., Sushko P. E., Shilova V. A., Lysukho A. S. Subjective and objective well-being in modern Russian society: results of empirical research. Informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten' (INAB). 2020;1. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/INAB.2020.1.

15. Korchagina I. I., Prokofieva L. M., Ter-Akopov S. A. Material deprivations in poverty estimations. Population. 2019;22(2):51–63. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00015.
Article

Received: 01.02.2025

Accepted: 28.03.2025

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Shushpanova, I. S. (2025). Dynamics of socio-economic attitudes of Russians under the conditions of the SWO: sociological measurement. Science. Culture. Society, 31(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2025.31.1.3
Section
Politics and social sphere of society