Value issues in national projects of the Russian Federation
Research Article
How to Cite
Roslavtseva M.V. Value issues in national projects of the Russian Federation. Science. Culture. Society. 2025. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 129-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2025.31.2.10 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article explores the theoretical foundations of the concept of “values” in philosophy and sociology, as well as their reflection in contemporary value-oriented policy, using as examples the national projects “Family” and “Youth and Children” and the Strategy for Family and Demographic Policy until 2036. Within the theoretical framework of the paper, the notion of “value” is examined from philosophical and sociological perspectives, based on the works of I. Kant, H. Rickert, É. Durkheim, M. Weber, T. Parsons, V. P. Tugarinov, V. A. Yadov, and N. P. Lapin. The reviewed theoretical approaches have been systematized according to their interpretative characteristics and grouped into three categories distinguished by their focus: normative, ideal, and practical. This classification served as a basis for a comparative analysis between the author's understanding of values and the existing interpretation of this category within Russian legislation. An analysis of the national projects and the Strategy revealed that they include specific mechanisms for transmitting values through upbringing, education, and cultural context, contributing to the reinforcement of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values outlined in Presidential Decree No. 809 of November 9, 2022. However, to increase their effectiveness, broader audience engagement and systematic alignment with already established societal value orientations are required, as current project implementations insufficiently account for these attitudes. The analysis presented allows for the formulation of practical recommendations aimed at improving value-oriented measures in state policy and may be useful for demographers, legal scholars, and philosophers working within the axiological tradition.
Keywords:
axiology, values, traditional spiritual and moral values, youth, value-oriented policy, national project “Family”, national project “Youth and children”, education, culture
References
1. Kant I. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Transl. by N. M. Sokolov. Moscow: Yurait; 2025. (In Russ.).
2. Kant I. Kritik der Urtheilskraft. Moscow: AST; 2006.
3. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Moscow: AST; 2025. (In Russ).
4. Meshkov I. M. Phenomenology of “axiological objectivity”. The relationship between object and value in the philosophy of I. Kant and H. Rickert’s neo-kantianism. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2025;(1-2):106–111. (In Russ). DOI 10.24412/2500-1000-2025-1-2-106-111.
5. Privalova I. V. Axiological component of paroemias: specificity and role in intercultural communication. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021;(3):143–157. (In Russ). 10.29025/2079-6021-2021-3-143-157.
6. Ayvazyan O. O. The axiological paradigm of value orientations through the prism of sociological science in the aspect of formation of a communicative legal culture. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2020;(2):15–19. (In Russ). DOI 10.23672/SAE.2020.2.56082.
7. Karimova L. N., Dustova Z. S. Research of value-semantic orientations of student youth in a multicultural environment. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan. 2023;2:12–24. (In Russ). DOI 10.23672/SAE.2020.2.56082.
8. Tugarinov V. P. Selected philosophical works. Leningrad: LSU Publ.; 1988. (In Russ).
9. Durkheim E. Value and "real" judgments. Transl. and intro by A. B. Hoffman. Sociological Research. 1991;(2):106–114. (In Russ).
10. Weber M. Selected works. Transl. from German. Moscow: Progress, 1990. (In Russ).
11. Parsons T. The system of modern societies. Transl. by L. A. Sedova, A. D. Kovaleva. Moscow: Aspect-Press; 1998. (In Russ).
12. Opazo Marmentini Ju. E. Returning to the young Talcott Parsons: the critique of utilitarian rationality, the problem of social integration, and the role of institutions and their link to ultimate values. Sociologica. 2024;39(109):51–86. DOI 10.24275/thcr1103.
13. Pavenkov O. V. Normativistic concepts of values and valuable orientations in the sociological science (E. Djurkgejm, M. Veber and T. Parsons). Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2011;(2):164–171. (In Russ).
14. Yadov V. A., Semyonov A. A., Vodzinskaya V. V. [et al.]. Self-regulation and forecasting of social behavior of a personality: A dispositional concept. 2nd exp. ed. Moscow: CSPiM; 2013. (In Russ).
15. Yadov V. A. A study of the consciousness and value world of Soviet people during the period of perestroika of society. Moscow: IS; 1990. (In Russ).
16. Lapin N. I. Dynamics of values of the population of reformed Russia. Bulletin of the Russian foundation for humanities. 1996;(2):141–150. (In Russ).
17. Lapin N. I. Dynamics of values of the population of reformed Russia. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 1996. (In Russ).
18. Lapin N. I. Modernization of the basic values of Russians. Sociological Studies. 1996;(5):3–23. (In Russ).
19. Rostovskaya T. K., Kaliev T. B. Value orientations of modern youth: features and trends. Moscow: Rusains; 2019. (In Russ).
20. Rostovskaya T. K., Shabunova A. A., Arkhangelsky V. N. [et al.] Demographic well-being of the regions of Russia. National Demographic Report – 2024. Moscow; Vologda: Vologda Scientific Center of the RAS; 2025. (In Russ).
21. Rostovskaya T. K., Sitkovsky A. M. Large multi-generation family as a key resource of the new long-term strategy for demographic development of Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025;(4):63–74. (In Russ). DOI 10.31857/S0869587325040127.
2. Kant I. Kritik der Urtheilskraft. Moscow: AST; 2006.
3. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Moscow: AST; 2025. (In Russ).
4. Meshkov I. M. Phenomenology of “axiological objectivity”. The relationship between object and value in the philosophy of I. Kant and H. Rickert’s neo-kantianism. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2025;(1-2):106–111. (In Russ). DOI 10.24412/2500-1000-2025-1-2-106-111.
5. Privalova I. V. Axiological component of paroemias: specificity and role in intercultural communication. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021;(3):143–157. (In Russ). 10.29025/2079-6021-2021-3-143-157.
6. Ayvazyan O. O. The axiological paradigm of value orientations through the prism of sociological science in the aspect of formation of a communicative legal culture. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2020;(2):15–19. (In Russ). DOI 10.23672/SAE.2020.2.56082.
7. Karimova L. N., Dustova Z. S. Research of value-semantic orientations of student youth in a multicultural environment. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan. 2023;2:12–24. (In Russ). DOI 10.23672/SAE.2020.2.56082.
8. Tugarinov V. P. Selected philosophical works. Leningrad: LSU Publ.; 1988. (In Russ).
9. Durkheim E. Value and "real" judgments. Transl. and intro by A. B. Hoffman. Sociological Research. 1991;(2):106–114. (In Russ).
10. Weber M. Selected works. Transl. from German. Moscow: Progress, 1990. (In Russ).
11. Parsons T. The system of modern societies. Transl. by L. A. Sedova, A. D. Kovaleva. Moscow: Aspect-Press; 1998. (In Russ).
12. Opazo Marmentini Ju. E. Returning to the young Talcott Parsons: the critique of utilitarian rationality, the problem of social integration, and the role of institutions and their link to ultimate values. Sociologica. 2024;39(109):51–86. DOI 10.24275/thcr1103.
13. Pavenkov O. V. Normativistic concepts of values and valuable orientations in the sociological science (E. Djurkgejm, M. Veber and T. Parsons). Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2011;(2):164–171. (In Russ).
14. Yadov V. A., Semyonov A. A., Vodzinskaya V. V. [et al.]. Self-regulation and forecasting of social behavior of a personality: A dispositional concept. 2nd exp. ed. Moscow: CSPiM; 2013. (In Russ).
15. Yadov V. A. A study of the consciousness and value world of Soviet people during the period of perestroika of society. Moscow: IS; 1990. (In Russ).
16. Lapin N. I. Dynamics of values of the population of reformed Russia. Bulletin of the Russian foundation for humanities. 1996;(2):141–150. (In Russ).
17. Lapin N. I. Dynamics of values of the population of reformed Russia. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 1996. (In Russ).
18. Lapin N. I. Modernization of the basic values of Russians. Sociological Studies. 1996;(5):3–23. (In Russ).
19. Rostovskaya T. K., Kaliev T. B. Value orientations of modern youth: features and trends. Moscow: Rusains; 2019. (In Russ).
20. Rostovskaya T. K., Shabunova A. A., Arkhangelsky V. N. [et al.] Demographic well-being of the regions of Russia. National Demographic Report – 2024. Moscow; Vologda: Vologda Scientific Center of the RAS; 2025. (In Russ).
21. Rostovskaya T. K., Sitkovsky A. M. Large multi-generation family as a key resource of the new long-term strategy for demographic development of Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025;(4):63–74. (In Russ). DOI 10.31857/S0869587325040127.
Article
Received: 30.04.2025
Accepted: 30.06.2025
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Roslavtseva, M. V. (2025). Value issues in national projects of the Russian Federation. Science. Culture. Society, 31(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2025.31.2.10
Section
Theory and practice of state governance
1.jpg)
